- ^Quick Reference Handbook Set, Basic Knowledge and Modern Technology ( revised ) by Edward H. Litchfield, Ph. D
- ^Journal Oeconomique p. 111 Die Maxime Laissez faire et laissez passer, ihr Ursprung, ihr Werden, 1866M. d’Argenson, ” Lettre au sujet de la dissertation sur le commerce du marquis de Belloni ‘, Avril 1751, Archived 2022 – 10-26 at the Wayback Machine. See A. Oncken, , 1866
- ^
As quoted in J. M. Keynes, 1926, “The End of Laissez Faire”. Argenson’s Mémoirs were published only in 1858, ed. Jannet, Tome V, p. 362. See A. Oncken (Die Maxime Laissez faire et laissez passer, ihr Ursprung, ihr Werden, 1866).
- ^Baghdiantz McCabe, Ina (2008). Orientalism in Early Modern France: Eurasian Trade Exoticism and the Ancien Regime. Berg Publishers. pp. 271–272. ISBN 978-1845203740.
- a bClarke, J. J. (1997). Oriental Enlightenment: The Encounter Between Asian and Western Thought. Routledge. p. 50. ISBN 978-0415133760.
- ^Mercure 1759), the Philosophie rurale 1763 and Ephémérides du Citoyen, 1767.), the Comte d’Albon (“Éloge Historique de M. Quesnay”, Nouvelles Ephémérides Économiques, May, 1775, pp. 136–137) and Oeuvres de Jacques Turgot, 1808–11, Vol. I, pp. 257, 259, Daire ed.) among others.Gournay was credited with the phrase by Jacques Turgot ( ” Eloge a Gournay “, 1759 ), the Marquis de Mirabeau 1763 và, 1767. ), the Comte d’Albon ( ” Éloge Historique de M. Quesnay “, , May, 1775, pp. 136 – 137 ) & DuPont de Nemours ( Introduction to, 1808 – 11, Vol. I, pp. 257, 259, Daire ed. ) among others .
- ^
“Tant, encore une fois, qu’on laisse faire la nature, on ne doit rien craindre de pareil”, P.S. de Boisguilbert, 1707, Dissertation de la nature des richesses, de l’argent et des tributs.
- ^op cit, p. 258. Oncken (op.cit) and Keynes (op.cit.) also credit the Marquis d’Argenson with the phrase “Pour gouverner mieux, il faudrait gouverner moins” (“To govern best, one needs to govern less”), possibly the source of the famous “That government is best which governs least” motto popular in American circles, attributed variously to DuPont de Nemours, , p. 258. Oncken ( ) và Keynes (. ) also credit the Marquis d’Argenson with the phrase ” ” ( ” To govern best, one needs Khủng govern less ” ), possibly the source social security calculator by age
the famous ” That government is best which governs least ” motto popular in American circles, attributed variously phệ Thomas Paine Thomas Jefferson và Henry Thoreau - a b c d
Fine, Sidney. Laissez Faire and the General-Welfare State. United States: The University of Michigan Press, 1964. Print
- ^
Macgregor, Economic Thought and Policy (London, 1949), pp. 54–67
- ^
Justice Part IV of Ethics (1892). p. 44.
- a bAdam Smith and the Origins of American Enterprise: How the Founding Fathers Turned to a Great Economist’s Writings and Created the American Economy, Macmillan, 2004, ISBN Roy C. Smith, , Macmillan, 2004, 0312325762, pp. 13 – 14 .
- ^
Abbott P. Usher; et al. (1931). “Economic History – The Decline of Laissez Faire”. American Economic Review. 22 (1, supplement): 3–10.
- ^Invisible Hand: The Wealth of Adam Smith, The Minerva Group, Inc., 2002, ISBN Andres Marroquin, , The Minerva Group, Inc., 2002, 1410202887, p. 123 .
- ^
John Eatwell, The Invisible Hand, W. W. Norton & Company, 1989, pp. Preface, x1.
- ^Individual Liberty: Selections from the Writings of Benjamin R. Tucker. New York: Vanguard Press. pp. 1–19.[ISBN missing]Tucker, Benjamin ( 1926 ) .. Thành Phố New York : Vanguard Press. pp. một – 19 .
- ^Christian Gerlach, Wu-Wei in Europe. A Study of Eurasian Economic Thought wu-wei, co-evolved with the inner-European laissez-faire principle, the Libaniusian model.” p. 8 “Thus, wu-wei has to be recognized as a laissez-faire instrument of Chinese political economy “p. 10 “Practising wu-wei erzhi. Consequently, it is this variant of the laissez-faire maxim in which the basis of Physiocracy’s ‘moral philosophy’ is to be located. Priddat’s work made clear that the wu-wei of the complete économie has to be considered central to Physiocracy; “p. 11 “that wu-wei translates into French as laissez-faire“.Archived 2020-08-03 at the Wayback Machine, London School of Economics – March 2005 p. 3″ the diffusion of, co-evolved with the inner-Europeanprinciple, the Libaniusian model.” p. 8 “Thus,has to be recognized as ainstrument of Chinese political economy “p. 10 “Practising. Consequently, it is this variant of themaxim in which the basis of Physiocracy’s ‘moral philosophy’ is to be located. Priddat’s work made clear that theof the completehas to be considered central to Physiocracy; “p. 11 “thattranslates into French as”.
- ^Rousseau and the Revolution, pp. 71–77, Simon and Schuster, 1967, ISBN 067163058X.Will và Ariel Durant, , pp. 71 – 77, Simon và Schuster, 1967 ,
- ^Rousseau and the Revolution, p. 76, Simon and Schuster, 1967, ISBN 067163058X.Will và Ariel Durant, , p. 76, Simon và Schuster, 1967 ,
- ^Scott Gordon (1955). “The London Economist and the High Tide of Laissez Faire”. Journal of Political Economy. 63 (6): 461–488. doi:10.1086/257722. S2CID 154921783.
- ^On Fairness and Efficiency. The Policy Press, 2000. ISBN George Miller .. The Policy Press, 2 ngàn. 978 – 1861342218 p. 344
- ^A Death-Dealing Famine:The Great Hunger in Ireland. Pluto Press, 1997. ISBN Christine Kinealy .. Pluto Press, 1997. 978 – 0745310749. p. 59 .
- ^
Dario Antiseri. Liberalismo politico e liberalismo economico. Rubettino.
- ^
F.Hayek (1997). Liberalismo. Ideazione. p. 62. Ciò comporta anche il rifiuto della distinzione tra liberalismo politico e liberalismo economico /elaborata in particolare da Croce come distinzione tra liberismo e liberalismo) Per la tradizione inglese, i due concetti sono inseparabili. Infatti, il principio fondamentale per cui l’intervento coercitivo dell’autorità statale deve limitarsi ad imporre il rispetto delle norme generali di mera condotta priva il governo del potere di dirigere e controllare le attività economiche degli individui.
- ^La Ricchezza delle Nazioni, laddove questi utilizzò il termine “liberal policy” un paio di volte per indicare il commercio privo di dazi. Smith non vedeva di buon occhio l’assenza di regolamentazione statale, infatti dichiarò: «Raramente la gente dello stesso mestiere si ritrova insieme, anche se per motivi di svago e di divertimento, senza che la conversazione risulti in una cospirazione contro i profani o in un qualche espediente per far alzare i prezzi».I sostenitori dell’esistenza di una dottrina liberista la attribuiscono ad Adam Smith e al suo saggio, laddove questi utilizzò il termine ” liberal policy ” un paio di volte per indicare il commercio privo di dazi. Smith mới vedeva di buon occhio l’assenza di regolamentazione statale, infatti dichiarò : «
- ^
La lingua francese parla di libéralisme politique e libéralisme économique (quest’ultimo chiamato anche laissez-faire, lett. lasciate fare), lo spagnolo di liberalismo social e liberalismo económico. La lingua inglese parla di free trade (libero commercio) ma usa il termine liberalism anche per riferirsi al liberismo economico.
- ^
Boehm-Bawerk (1999). Potere o legge economica?. Rubbettino. p. 67.
- ^Bourgin, Frank (1989). The Great Challenge: The Myth of Laissez-Faire in the Early Republic. New York: George Braziller Inc. ISBN 978-0060972967.[page needed]
- ^Prince, Carl E.; Taylor, Seth (1982). “Daniel Webster, the Boston Associates, and the U.S. Government’s Role in the Industrializing Process, 1815–1830”. Journal of the Early Republic. 2 (3): 283–299. doi:10.2307/3122975. JSTOR 3122975.
- ^
Rand, Ayn Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal, Ch. 7, New American Library, Signet, 1967.
- ^Armstrong, J. Scott; Green, Kesten C. (2013-10-01). “Effects of corporate social responsibility and irresponsibility policies”. Journal of Business Research. Strategic Thinking in Marketing. 66 (10): 1922–1927. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.663.508doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.014. S2CID 145059055.
- ^Paris, Jeffrey (1 July 2005). “Rethinking the End of Modernity”. Social Philosophy Today. 21: 173–189. doi:10.5840/socphiltoday20052120.
- ^Kilgore, Christopher D. (2017). “Bad Networks: From Virus to Cancer in Post-Cyberpunk Narrative”. Journal of Modern Literature. 40 (2): 165–183. doi:10.2979/jmodelite.40.2.10. JSTOR 10.2979/jmodelite.40.2.10. S2CID 157670471.
- ^
Chartier, Gary; Johnson, Charles W. (2011). Markets Not Capitalism: Individualist Anarchism Against Bosses, Inequality, Corporate Power, and Structural Poverty. Brooklyn, NY:Minor Compositions/Autonomedia
- ^
“It introduces an eye-opening approach to radical social thought, rooted equally in libertarian socialism and market anarchism.” Chartier, Gary; Johnson, Charles W. (2011). Markets Not Capitalism: Individualist Anarchism Against Bosses, Inequality, Corporate Power, and Structural Poverty. Brooklyn, NY: Minor Compositions/Autonomedia. p. back cover.
- ^
Brown, Susan Love. 1997. “The Free Market as Salvation from Government”. In Meanings of the Market: The Free Market in Western Culture. Berg Publishers. p. 107.
- ^
Carson, Kevin A. (2008). Organization Theory: A Libertarian Perspective. Charleston, SC:BookSurge.
- ^
Carson, Kevin A. (2010). The Homebrew Industrial Revolution: A Low-Overhead Manifesto. Charleston, SC: BookSurge.
- ^
Long, Roderick T. (2000). Reason and Value: Aristotle versus Rand. Washington, DC:Objectivist Center
- ^
Sciabarra, Chris Matthew (2000). Total Freedom: Toward a Dialectical Libertarianism. University Park, PA:Pennsylvania State University Press.
- ^
Chartier, Gary (2009). Economic Justice and Natural Law. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
- ^
Gillis, William (2011). “The Freed Market.” In Chartier, Gary and Johnson, Charles. Markets Not Capitalism. Brooklyn, NY: Minor Compositions/Autonomedia. pp. 19–20.
- ^
Chartier, Gary; Johnson, Charles W. (2011). Markets Not Capitalism: Individualist Anarchism Against Bosses, Inequality, Corporate Power, and Structural Poverty. Brooklyn, NY: Minor Compositions/Autonomedia. pp. 1–16.
- ^
Gary Chartier and Charles W. Johnson (eds). Markets Not Capitalism: Individualist Anarchism Against Bosses, Inequality, Corporate Power, and Structural Poverty. Minor Compositions; 1st edition (November 5, 2011
- ^
Marx, Theories of Surplus Value, III, p. 501.
- ^
See Gary Chartier, Anarchy and Legal Order: Law and Politics for a Stateless Society (New York: Cambridge UP 2013) 44–156.
- ^
See Gary Chartier, “Natural Law and Non-Aggression,” Acta Juridica Hungarica 51.2 (June 2010): 79–96 and, for an earlier version, Justice 32–46.
- ^
See Justice 47–68.
- ^
See Gary Chartier, “Pirate Constitutions and Workplace Democracy,” Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik 18 (2010): 449–467.
- ^
See Gary Chartier,’ “Intellectual Property and Natural Law,” Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 36 (2011): 58–88.
- ^
See Justice 176–182.
- a b c dSpencer J. Pack. Capitalism as a Moral System : Adam Smith’s Critique of the miễn phí Market Economy. Great Britain : Edward Elgar, 2010. Print
- ^
Hobbes, Thomas (1909–14). Of Man, Being the First Part of Leviathan. Collier & Son.
- ^Macfie, A.L. (1959). “Adam Smith’s Moral Sentiments as Foundation for His Wealth of Nations”. Oxford Economic Papers. 11 (3): 209–228. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a040824.
- ^McNally, David (1993). Against the Market: Political Economy, Market Socialism and the Marxist Critique. Verso. ISBN 978-0860916062.
- ^
Dostaler, Gilles, Keynes and His Battles (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2007), p. 91.
- ^
Dostaler 2007, p. 91; Barnett, Vincent, John Maynard Keynes (Routledge, 2013), p. 143.
Source: https://chickgolden.com
Leave a Comment